I buried this in my last "Download Pages" reply, but I wanted to make sure you all saw it and could comment.
----------------------------------- Changes to git repo/groupId? ------------------------------------ As far as the GIt repo and groupId names for the Command-line Tool are concerned, I agree that keeping "commandline" as one word in the repo, groupId, and artifacts looks cleaner. In looking at the repo names and pom.xml files, I wonder if it is reasonable to change the following: incubator-taverna-common-activities --> groupId to org.apache.taverna.common.activities incubator-taverna-commandline --> name to Apache Taverna Command-line incubator-taverna-workbench-common-activities --> groupId to org.apache.workbench.common.activities --> artifact to apache-workbench-common-activity I don't know how difficult it is to manage all the relationships, but it would be nice if these were consistent. ------------------------------------ Question ------------------------------------ incubator-taverna-workbench-product has the same groupId as incubator-taverna-workbench. Is this correct?
