Starting the review process... ------------------------------------------ UP-FRONT CHECKS ------------------------------------------ The MD5 checksums in the [VOTE] email are the same as the SHA1 checksums. I'm using the downloaded MD5 and SHA-1.
(Question) I'm curious what r13865 means: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/rc2/ (r13865) I didn't see the commit ID in the [VOTE] email. Did I miss it? ------------------------------------------ LICENSES - THIRD-PARTY.properties file ------------------------------------------ The list of # Already used licenses in project : includes # - GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1 Isn't this a category-x license? (It doesn't show up in the "Please fill in the missing licenses" list.) Missing licenses: # http://x-stream.github.io/license.html - this link says BSD (but not which type); should this copyright be included in our Notice file? org.aopalliance--com.springsource.org.aopalliance--1.0.0 - no license listed # https://github.com/hunterhacker/jdom/blob/jdom-1.1/core/LICENSE.txt - this link has a copyright; include in Notice file? What do we use for "type" of license? "Copyright?" Or is this also a "JDOM License" like org.jdom--com.springsource.org.jdom--1.1.0? # http://www.xmlpull.org/ - no license listed Category B licenses? Aren't these listed under category-b, binary release only? Or do they meet the exception for allowing in a source release? ("For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at runtime in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and unlikely to be changed ...") javax.transaction--com.springsource.javax.transaction--1.1.0 - CDDL 1.0 org.aspectj--com.springsource.org.aspectj.runtime--1.6.0 - Eclipse Public License 1.0 org.aspectj--com.springsource.org.aspectj.weaver--1.6.0 - Eclipse Public License 1.0 That's as far as I can get today. Will do the rest of the review tomorrow. Gale On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:18 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > On 1 June 2016 at 12:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of > > > > Apache Taverna Engine 3.1.0-incubating > > Apache Taverna Common Activities 2.1.0-incubating > > Apache Taverna Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating > > .. > > Build the release candidate *in the above order*, using: > > Sorry I mixed up the order in the checksums which were immediately > above in this vote email - to clarify the build order is: > > taverna-engine > taverna-common-activities > taverna-commandline > > The reason is that command line depends on common-activities, which > depend on taverna-engine, all in the same version as being released. > > > Perhaps for the next vote emails I will include the full URIs to the > folders rather than just ../rc2/ > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 >
