I'm not seeing that the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the jars reflect the
NOTICE in the source tree. If source is used to make the jars, they
should have the L&N passed on. (not for dependencies)
(
Stian - the discussion on legal@ prompted me to look:
"Including "modified code" dependencies in LICENSE or NOTICE"
)
Andy
On 08/01/18 17:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
As RC1 broke without .git - here's RC2:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/00b8faaa002b6708bdfd7846b16078be06ad781e49535bcc397b4758@%3Cdev.taverna.apache.org%3E
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:29:29 +0000, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote:
Reply to this thread for any questions/issues for the
Taverna Server 3.1.0 release candidate.
Reply to the separate [VOTE] thread with your formal vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/319eac1ea18f89d635d3c05bf1dc3f644c5f76f79673f7e0ac141194@%3Cdev.taverna.apache.org%3E
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,
please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your
votes!
How to review a release? https://s.apache.org/review-release
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
