GitHub sounds like a good option to me. Thanks, Ian! Working at Facebook is going great. I'm very happy. Hope you and Stian are doing well also.
Gale On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 8:45 AM Ian Dunlop <ianwdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I think a "GitHub organisation" seems like a good idea. Staying in Apache > would obviously be great but the release process seems to keep hitting > barriers. I would have liked the minimal amount of projects to stay in > Apache but who could do that. I almost got a release of mobile out and knew > what to do but in the end couldn't find time plus I wasn't sure if > releasing code without having a clear purpose or community was a good idea. > Maybe getting core repos to graduation. Maybe mobile. Move the others to > github. That could be an idea. > > Cheers > > Ian > > Ps nice to hear from you gale. Hope things are going well for you. > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019, 10:12 Stian Soiland-Reyes, <st...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 05:41:34 -0700, Gale Naylor < >> ga...@noventussolutions.com> wrote: >> > Stian, is an "incubator release ... to verify that the Intellectual >> > Property is clean" the same thing as the "token release" that lets >> Taverna >> > graduate? >> >> That was not my intention, the release would be all proper, just that >> its main purpose would be to clear IP rather than provide it to the >> user. >> >> I think one challenge for us is the many git repositories for different >> modules and we have released them separately, e.g. to correspond with >> git tags. >> >> As some of the modules were not in a mature enough state code-wise or >> build-wise they have not been released yet. We could do a incubator >> release of these which would primarily be to ensure their code base has >> been through the incubator and cleared their IP. Then their code can >> join us in graduation. >> >> Some repos like Taverna Language we have already released, so they are >> IP clear and have mature code/build systems. If we were to drop the >> other repositories, with these it is almost trivial to do a release, >> which we could do as a "token release" to show the IPMC is still working >> and able to vote on releases. >> >> >> The Taverna Mobile is dfferent - it is mature in a sense both in >> code and build, and have clean IP as fresh project, but it has a >> different build system without assisted release. Here I think just >> manual work (or script) is needed - but it is a bit tedious. >> >> So in a sense we have many options, but I would say they all require >> making and voting on releases. >> >> >> >>
