Hi all,

I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache Teaclave
TrustZone SDK (incubating) 0.5.0 (release candidate 1).

Although this release follows shortly after the approval of the v0.4.0 on
June 3, please note that the earlier release was initiated back on February
27 and was significantly delayed due to a prolonged voting process. Since
then, we’ve made improvements to streamline the process and hope this
release proceeds more smoothly.

The release note is available in:
-
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc.1

The release candidate to be voted over is available at:
-
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/teaclave/trustzone-sdk-0.5.0-rc.1/

The release candidate is signed with a GPG key available at:
- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/teaclave/KEYS

Instructions to verify the release candidate’s signature:
- https://teaclave.apache.org/download/#verify-the-integrity-of-the-files

Incubator release checklist for reference:
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist

The release artifacts have passed all GitHub Actions CI checks. You can
also reproduce the build process manually from source using the following
commands:
```
$ wget
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/teaclave/trustzone-sdk-0.5.0-rc.1/apache-teaclave-trustzone-sdk-0.5.0-incubating.tar.gz
$ tar zxvf apache-teaclave-trustzone-sdk-0.5.0-incubating.tar.gz
$ cd apache-teaclave-trustzone-sdk-0.5.0-incubating
$ docker run --rm -it -v$(pwd):/teaclave-trustzone-sdk -w \
/teaclave-trustzone-sdk yuanz0/teaclave-trustzone-sdk:ubuntu-24.04 \
bash -c "./setup.sh && (./build_optee_libraries.sh optee) && source \
environment && make && (cd ci && ./ci.sh)"
```

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Anyone can participate
in testing and voting, not just committers, please feel free to try
out the release candidate and provide your votes to this thread
explicitly.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Best,
Zhaofeng

Reply via email to