I agree, Alan. I will wait a few more days to give everybody here a chance to chime in. If I hear nothing else, reaching out to Phoenix will be the next step. Cheers -Andreas
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:04 AM Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on my observation of this podling over the last couple of years I > don't think its community currently has sufficient momentum be a TLP. So > if Phoenix or another project is interested in accepting Tephra then that > looks like a good option to me. > > Alan. > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:49 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Graduating into an existing TLP is definitely an option for exiting the > > Incubator. If you’d like to pursue it you should begin a discussion on > the > > Phoenix dev list. Tephra could be merged in as the transaction oracle > that > > ships out of the box for transactional tables, there’s a lot about that > > which makes sense. > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > Observing that this project is not making much progress towards > > graduation, > > > the community has not grown much over the last year, and not many new > > > features have been added, activity overall is pretty low and the > project > > > seems a bit stagnating. > > > > > > I am wondering whether we should think about next steps for Tephra: Can > > it > > > graduate? Could it be a valuable contribution to another project, for > > > example Phoenix? If not, what would it take to get there? Or should it > be > > > retired? > > > > > > Just throwing out thoughts - wondering what's the sentiment in this > > group? > > > > > > Cheers -Andreas. > > >
