Thanks everyone, I will archive the hackathon-related PRs and leave a message for authors to continue discussion or work on it in the future, possibly with new PRs.
On May 20, 2026 at 10:55 PM -0700, Ryan Zhang <[email protected]>, wrote: I am also in favor of archiving them for now, but keeping the discussion open for the ideas that they introduce. For the hackathon it is a good exercise, but obviously all of the PRs need to be refined and likely broken into multiple PRs before they can be merged. Thanks, Ryan On Wed, May 20, 2026, 10:50 PM Chen Li <[email protected]> wrote: I agree with both Yicong and Meng. On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:44 PM Meng Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yicong, > > I agree with this approach. > > Taking my hackathon project as an example, it introduced multiple features > in a single PR. Even if we decide to merge some of them into main, I think > they should first be decoupled into smaller, more focused PRs. During that > process, we should also carefully consider which features are actually > suitable for main. > > Some ideas may be great for a hackathon because they are creative and > exploratory, but they may not necessarily be appropriate to merge into the > main branch without further discussion, refinement, and review. > > Best, > Meng > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:38 PM Yicong Huang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It was a great hackathon experience! > > > > There are still 30+ hackathon PRs open on GitHub. I am thinking about > > archiving them by closing the PRs for now, but I wanted to get your > > thoughts before doing so. Even if we close them, we can still continue > the > > discussions and consider merging useful parts into the main branch later, > > ideally by breaking them down into smaller, decoupled PRs. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Best, > > Yicong Huang > > [email protected] > > > > > Best regards, Yicong Huang
