GitHub user Yicong-Huang added a comment to the discussion: Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner
yeah I had experiences with Jenkins and we chose GitHub Actions for its simplicity and native integration with GitHub. I do concern about management overhead on self-hosted runners, and I am trying to propose some ideas in the above "Risks & ownership" section. We may need to have fall back plans such that when self-runners time out, fall back to GitHub default runners, which eventually adds more end to end time on CI, I hope that happens not that frequently. Thanks for confirming the hardware resource! I am a bit concerned on Texera's future CI resources, thus wanted to be conservative but also make sure it is enough for the near future as we add more legs in testing infra. building ephemeral VMs is almost a must have for security purposes. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/texera/discussions/6973#discussioncomment-17818028 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
