GitHub user sshiv012 added a comment to the discussion: AI-generated descriptions in issues and PRs
I looked at a few approaches. [Team NewPipe](https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe/blob/dev/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) prohibits using generative AI to fill issue or PR templates, while [FastAPI](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/security) permits AI assistance for reports but requires human verification and disclosure. [Apache guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) likewise keeps responsibility for generated material with the contributor. More generally, [GitHub recommends](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/getting-started/helping-others-review-your-changes) descriptions that let reviewers understand a change quickly. A balanced practice for Texera could be: require a short, human-edited summary first (problem/motivation, proposed change, and how it was verified); put optional implementation detail below; disclose substantial AI assistance; and require the author to understand the submission and answer questions about it. The same compact template could apply whether or not AI was used, since verbosity rather than the tool itself is the immediate readability problem. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/texera/discussions/7377#discussioncomment-17927719 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
