+1 (binding)

verified signatures. Built on single node vm with hadoop 2.6.0 & secure
shuffle. Tested couple of sample jobs; worked fine.
Tested with hive in larger cluster with hadoop 2.8.x. Tested few hive jobs
at 10 TB scale; worked fine.

~Rajesh.B

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Build it successfully with hadoop 2.6, 2.2 & 2.7
> Ran several examples on single-mode cluster successfully.
>
>
> Best Regard,
> Jeff Zhang
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/24/15, 7:35 AM, "Tassapol Athiapinya" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >+1 (binding)
> >
> >- Verified checksum
> >- Ran unit tests
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Tassapol
> >
> >On 6/23/15, 11:50 AM, "Hitesh Shah" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi folks,
> >>
> >>Following up on the previous RC where a couple of issues were discovered
> >>and a few more commits went in since then: I have now created an new RC1
> >>for tez-0.5.4.
> >>
> >>Tez 0.5.4 contains various discovered bugs over the past few months since
> >>the 0.5.3 release and is probably the last planned maintenance release
> >>for the 0.5 branch.
> >>
> >>GIT source tag
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tez/repo?p=tez.git;a=log;h=refs/t
> >>a
> >>gs/release-0.5.4-rc1 ( commit hash
> >>6f0717e5e36f0d088d41256fe6a24af791692663 )
> >>
> >>Staging site:
> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tez/tez-0.5.4-src-rc1/ ( svn rev
> >>9488 )
> >>
> >>Nexus Staging URL:
> >>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetez-1027
> >>
> >>PGP release keys
> >>http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA9510905F0B000F0
> >>
> >>KEYS file available at
> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tez/KEYS
> >>
> >>One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+TEZ+AND+fixVersion
> >>+
> >>%3D+0.5.4+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
> >>
> >>Vote will be open for 72 hours ( until Fri 26th June ).
> >>
> >>[ ] +1 approve
> >>[ ] +0 no opinion
> >>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >>I begin with my vote with my +1
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>‹ Hitesh
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to