Did a quick scan of the jiras targeted to 0.7.1,

Of the five listed below, two already have a +1, and the other three are in
patch available. Of the 5, TEZ-2943 will have the largest benefit to
customers.

TEZ-1491 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1491>

Tez reducer-side merge's counter update is slow
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1491>
TEZ-2824 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2824>

Add javadocs for Vertex.setConf and DAG.setConf
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2824>
TEZ-2943 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2943>

Auto reduce parallelism estimates badly on vertices with two disparate
input sources <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2943>
TEZ-2966 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2966>

Tez does not honor mapreduce.task.timeout
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2966>
TEZ-2972 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2972>

Ability for Tez AM to ignore node updates from YARN
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2972>

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> We have TEZ-0.7.0 release around half an year ago. During the last 6
> months, we got lots of feedback from tez users, and fix many bugs. I am
> thinking this is a good time for the 0.7.1 release now.  And for this
> release, we would release binary version of tez for different hadoop
> versions for the first time. The candidate hadoop version in my mind is
> 2.2/2.4/2.6/2.7
>
> I have go through tickets targeted for 0.7.1 and move out some tickets to
> 0.7.2 which I think is not critical.  And there's still 21 tickets left,
> you can check them on the following link, if you feel that's critical for
> you, please reply this thread and mark the ticket as blocker of 0.7.1
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TEZ%20AND%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%3D%200.7.1%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>
>
>
> Best Regard,
> Jeff Zhang
>
>

Reply via email to