Hi All,

Given that there are no comments, hope I can assume that things are well
and good.
Shortly I’l start a voting mail thread to merge to master from TEZ-2980.

All the changes are in a separate directory, and the merge will not affect
tez-ui or any other module in the project.
Later on v1 can be replaced with v2.

Thanks,
Sreenath

On 2/11/16, 6:37 PM, "Sreenath Somarajapuram" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I would like to notify that Tez UI v2 is in parity with Tez UI v1. All
>the 
>required functionalities have been committed, and new features are in
>pipeline.
>Developments until now was tracked under the umbrella ticket -
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2980
>Future developments will be tracked under -
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3106
>
>Until now v2 development had been happening under TEZ-2980 branch, and
>feel this might be the right time to merge it to master.
>The initial merge can just put v2 into master. Eventually before the next
>release, and after more testing v1 can be replaced with v2.
>
>Please share your thoughts.
>
>Thank you,
>Sreenath
>
>On 1/23/16, 2:35 AM, "Sreenath Somarajapuram"
><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>A new version of Tez UI is taking form under branch TEZ-2980. All the
>>basic functionalities are in.
>>
>>Set-up instruction can be found at
>>https://github.com/apache/tez/tree/TEZ-2980/tez-ui2
>>All the work is tracked under
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2980
>>
>>Please try, and share your thoughts.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sreenath
>>
>>On 12/15/15, 5:30 PM, "Sreenath Somarajapuram" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>
>>>This mail is to notify that branch TEZ-2980 was created, and all the
>>>changes made to the branch would be tracked under TEZ-2980.
>>>The changes would reside under a new module named tez-ui2 under tez
>>>directory.
>>>
>>>As conveyed in the previous mail, the plan is to go for a "commit and
>>>then
>>>review approach². A complete review would happen at the end, and the
>>>branch would be merged back to master on getting 3 +1s.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Sreenath
>>>
>>>On 12/9/15, 11:23 PM, "Sreenath Somarajapuram"
>>><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks you Hitesh, Siddharth & Rajesh.
>>>>
>>>>Please find the umbrella jira for this task at
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2980.
>>>>
>>>>Current plan is to go for a "commit and then review approach" to ease
>>>>the
>>>>development process.
>>>>A new branch would be created for the changes by tomorrow EOD, and the
>>>>changes would be added to a new module named "tez-ui2" under tez.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Please let me know your comments and concerns.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Sreenath
>>>>
>>>>On 12/4/15, 5:25 AM, "Rajesh Balamohan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>+1 on creating new branch for working on this change.
>>>>>
>>>>>~Rajesh.B
>>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Siddharth Seth <[email protected]>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for using a branch if it's a complicated change. One thing to
>>>>>>note
>>>>>>is
>>>>>> that rebasing branches may not be possible anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > +1 on the idea.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Given this is a major change and if it cannot be done in a single
>>>>>>commit,
>>>>>> > I would recommend doing these changes on a branch similar to the
>>>>>>work 
>>>>>>for
>>>>>> > TEZ-2003.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > thanks
>>>>>> > ‹ Hitesh
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Nov 30, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Sreenath Somarajapuram <
>>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > Hi All,
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > As many of you know, Tez UI is build over a JavaScript
>>>>>>application
>>>>>> > framework named Ember js.
>>>>>> > > The framework version that we use currently (1.7) is getting
>>>>>>obsolete.
>>>>>> > So was wondering about migrating UI code to the latest (2.2)
>>>>>>version.
>>>>>> > > Please share your thoughts on the same.
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Cheers,
>>>>>> > > Sreenath
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>


Reply via email to