Having address the critical feedback given on the TEZ-3334 jira, will start a vote thread.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Siddharth Seth <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes sense to get the merge process started. Would be nice to have a > little more time to look at the changes, and provide feedback. Targeting > end of the week. Hopefully before that. > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Jason Lowe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 for merging the new shuffle handler to master. > > Jason > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 9:41 AM, Jonathan Eagles < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Folks, let's have all feedback by EOB Thursday, and I'll start the VOTE > on > > Friday if that is the direction the community is heading. > > > > jeagles > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Jonathan Eagles <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > At this time, it may be advantageous to move the Tez Shuffle Handler > > > development and maintenance to the master line. This would allow the > tez > > > community to make this feature available to a wider audience. I would > > like > > > to get community feedback on proposing a vote to merge the TEZ-3334 > > branch > > > to the master line. I can say that I have tested this extensively and > for > > > auto-reduce parallelism jobs, this reduces the shuffle time > dramatically > > on > > > highly reduced jobs. > > > > > > A list of features can be found on the umbrella JIRA > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3334 > > > In addition I have made a patch file available to see the 423KB of > > > differences so we can have a discussion over the changes. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > jeagles > > > > > > > > > > > >
