> -----Original Message----- > From: Gopal Vijayaraghavan <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 2:20 PM > To: [email protected]; Hitesh Sharma <[email protected]>; . Anupam > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: TEZ-1190 status > > As far as I know, that patch + design has been abandoned. > > There was a discussion about adding it without fundamentally changing the > DAGImpl (and task recovery etc). > > The VertexManager already allows you to have a vertex without a task in it, > without giving up on being a participant in the data movement events.
This sounds very promising. Can you point me to any tests, or sample code, or the implementation code I should be looking at? > However, there are no immediate takers for the new approach (which is > additive, so needs no significant refactoring changes) and this feature did > not > have anyone waiting for it. If it can be done with the above suggestion, I can pick up this work, if it is OK.
