At this time of your email, what I consider blocking jiras were TEZ-4031 (now resolved), TEZ-3995, (now resolved), and TEZ-4052 (Patch available). Once TEZ-4052 is resolved, I think we can proceed with the release. Thanks for taking up this effort, Kuhu. It's a big contribution of work for the community.
Best, jeagles On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 10:58 AM Kuhu Shukla <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Since we have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-4004 (which was a > blocker for 0.9.2) checked in, I am resuming work on getting 0.9.2 release > candidate out soon. If the community has any ongoing JIRAs that they think > are blockers for this release, please mark them as blockers and/or reply on > this email thread. Appreciate the participation! > > Regards, > Kuhu > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:06 PM Kuhu Shukla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello again! > > > > I think we are in a position to start the release process and the above > > mentioned JIRAs are not quite in the blocker category. They are more of > > good bug fixes to have which we can include in the next line. Any thoughts > > are appreciated and I hope to do a RC next week unless we decide otherwise > > post this discussion. > > > > Appreciate any and all inputs. > > > > Regards, > > Kuhu > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kuhu Shukla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello folks, > >> > >> I would like to start the discussion around the release plan for Tez > >> 0.9.2. > >> > >> Currently there are a 7 patch available > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3939?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20%22Apache%20Tez%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20%20%20%20AND%20(%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.next%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.2%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9)%20> > >> and 8 Open JIRAs > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3800?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20%22Apache%20Tez%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20%20%20AND%20(%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.next%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9.2%20OR%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%20%3D%200.9)%20> > >> that > >> are targeted to 0.9.2/0.9.next. Please add any JIRA(s) that you think is a > >> good addition to 0.9.2 or move them out to the next version if it is not a > >> required fix/feature for the current release plan. If you are working on > >> one of the JIRAs targeted for 0.9.2, feel free to share the status on the > >> JIRAs on this thread. I will reach out independently to the > >> assignees/reviewers/reporters of these JIRAs in the next couple days if we > >> don't see an update on them. > >> > >> I would appreciate any and all comments/thoughts on setting the > >> requirements and expectations for this release! > >> > >> To start of this discussion, from my side TEZ-3910 and TEZ-3918 are good > >> fixes that should make this release, the former one is a higher priority. > >> They are in PA state and need reviews at the moment. > >> > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> Kuhu > >> > >> > >> > >>
