https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-4074
Which doesn't necessarily mean it's a bug, but rather there are two different versions of guava in the classpath. Can you continue the conversation there? On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 10:45 AM Suryansh Agnihotri < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jonathan > should I create a Jira for this? > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 15:47, Suryansh Agnihotri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Jonathan >> I tried with 0.10.0 but now I am getting below error in the test. >> Building doc does not mention any setup to be done. I just installed all >> requirements mentioned in the doc. >> I am using "mvn test -Dhadoop.version=3.1.2 -Phadoop3 >> -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3" to run the tests. >> >> [INFO] Running org.apache.tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils >> [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 4.331 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils >> [ERROR] org.apache.tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils Time elapsed: 4.33 s >> <<< ERROR! >> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: >> com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.addCallback(Lcom/google/common/util/concurrent/ListenableFuture;Lcom/google/common/util/concurrent/FutureCallback;)V >> at >> org.apache.tez.common.TestTezCommonUtils.setup(TestTezCommonUtils.java:65) >> >> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 22:48, Suryansh Agnihotri < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, I'll check the 0.10 branch and let you know if face any issues. >>> >>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 21:20, Jonathan Eagles <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Essentially, 0.10 and 0.9 are the same with the exception of hadoop 3.x >>>> compatibility and a few minor changes. Both release lines are considered >>>> active and fully supported. I will suggest development using the >>>> branch-0.10.0 or master branch for this case. In this way if there are >>>> other incompatibilities found, you can get the best support from the tez >>>> open source community. >>>> >>>> Let me know if this helps guide you to a decision. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:43 AM Suryansh Agnihotri < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Jonathan >>>>> Thanks for the quick response. I am trying to build tez 0.9.2 with >>>>> Hadoop 3.1.2.using "mvn package -Dhadoop.version=3.1.0 -Phadoop3". >>>>> Will I be not able to use "branch-0.9.2", could you please specify if >>>>> there are many compatibility issues observed/fixed wrt Hadoop 3.1+. >>>>> If there are a few, can I just backport them in my "branch-0.92", will >>>>> that make sense? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 21:04, Jonathan Eagles <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Suryansh, thanks for reaching out to this email list. We are going to >>>>>> need some more information about the issue. This message can occur for a >>>>>> number of reasons. TEZ-3884 is most directly related to running tez >>>>>> against >>>>>> hadoop 3.1+. Tez has created a new branch branch-0.10 to address hadoop 3 >>>>>> compatibility. If your issue is related to hadoop 3 compatibility, please >>>>>> try tez 0.10.0 or branch-10.0 or even master branch. If you are running >>>>>> against hadoop 2.x, then likely this is a different issue and will need >>>>>> more understanding of client classpath setup as per >>>>>> http://tez.apache.org/install.html. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> jeagles >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:23 AM Suryansh Agnihotri < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>> I am facing the same issue >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3884 >>>>>>> but this is marked as resolved. >>>>>>> Could anyone please help with this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tez branch: *branch-0.9.2* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> StackTrace: >>>>>>> [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : >>>>>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Users/suryansh/Documents/OSS/tez/tez-api/src/test/java/org/apache/tez/client/TestTezClientUtils.java:[48,30] >>>>>>> cannot find symbol >>>>>>> symbol: class DistributedFileSystem >>>>>>> location: package org.apache.hadoop.hdfs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>
