[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bryan Duxbury updated THRIFT-681:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: thrift-682-v2.patch

I just spent a few minutes fixing the spacing and reviewing the v2 patch to 
come up with this cleaner version. But then I realized that we hadn't come to a 
clear conclusion as to whether we wanted to encourage the "@param in above 
block" or "comments on individual elements" doc style.

> The HTML generator does not handle JavaDoc style comments very well
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-681
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Compiler (General)
>    Affects Versions: 0.2
>            Reporter: John Bartak
>            Assignee: Bryan Duxbury
>         Attachments: Screenshot.png, screenshot-1.jpg, 
> t_html_generator_JavaDoc.patch, t_html_generator_JavaDoc.v2.patch, 
> thrift-682-v2.patch
>
>
> If you create comments using the standard JavaDoc conventions of @param and 
> @exception, the output that gets generated isn't the cleanest.  It would be 
> better if the list of parameters and exceptions were placed in a table with 
> the appropriate headers rather than just outputting the @param and @exception 
> tags into the HTML output.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to