[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jens Geyer updated THRIFT-1768:
-------------------------------
Description: Required fields within unions should issue a warning. First,
required makes not much sense with unions. Next, most languages are already
treating them as optional anyway, effectively ignoring the required attribute.
(was: Required fields within unions should issue a warning. First, required
makes not much sense qith unions. Next, most languages are already treating
them as optional anyway, effectively ignoring the required attribute.)
> unions can't have required fields (Compiler)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-1768
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1768
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compiler (General)
> Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.9
> Reporter: Jens Geyer
> Assignee: Jens Geyer
> Fix For: 1.0
>
> Attachments:
> THRIFT-1768_unions_cant_have_required_fields_Compiler.patch
>
>
> Required fields within unions should issue a warning. First, required makes
> not much sense with unions. Next, most languages are already treating them as
> optional anyway, effectively ignoring the required attribute.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
