[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13593911#comment-13593911
]
Hudson commented on THRIFT-1264:
--------------------------------
Integrated in Thrift #625 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Thrift/625/])
Thrift-1264:TSocketClient is queried by run loop after deallocation in
Cocoa (Revision 04f83112f6a84d5f572921990adf4b122e15d377)
Result = ABORTED
> TSocketClient is queried by run loop after deallocation in Cocoa
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-1264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1264
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cocoa - Library
> Affects Versions: 0.7, 0.9
> Environment: iPad, iOS SDK 4.3, iOS SDK 5.1
> Reporter: Jan Rüth
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.9, 1.0
>
> Attachments: THRIFT-1264.diff, TSocketClient.m
>
>
> When using TSocketClient in a Cocoa client and correctly managing the memory:
> {code:title=Server.m|borderStyle=solid}
> - (id)initWithServer:(NSString*)server port:(NSInteger)port
> {
> self = [super init];
> if (self) {
> TSocketClient *transport = [[TSocketClient alloc]
> initWithHostname:server
> port:port];
> TBinaryProtocol *protocol = [[TBinaryProtocolFactory sharedFactory]
> newProtocolOnTransport:transport];
> Client *client = [[Client alloc] initWithProtocol:protocol];
> // self.client is a retained property
> self.client = client;
> [client release];
> [protocol release];
> [transport release];
> }
>
> return self;
> }
> - (void)dealloc {
> self.client = nil;
> [super dealloc];
> }
> {code}
> (maybe this should be fixed in the cocoa example, memory management is
> erroneous there)
> After successfully releasing the object with the code above. One gets a
> EXC_BAD_ACCESS signal because the runloop send a responseToSelector: message
> to our object. With the selector stream:handleEvent:
> This all leads to TSocketClient which opens two NSStream objects and
> delegates it self to both, afterwards both Streams are scheduled in the
> runloop, which should actually notify the delegate when something happens to
> the stream like data is available, this obviously results in the runloop
> asking TSocketClient for previously described selector. However this
> mechanism is not used, the TNSStreamTransport class is subclassed and
> responsible for read/write.
> So why are the Streams schedules in the run loop in the first place?
> Why are the streams not closed and released when the object gets deallocated?
> I could fix this behavior by implementing a dealloc method in TSocketClient
> and making the Streams member variables
> {code:title=TSocketClient.h|borderStyle=solid}
> @interface TSocketClient : TNSStreamTransport {
> NSInputStream * inputStream;
> NSOutputStream * outputStream;
> }
> {code}
> {code:title=TSocketClient.m|borderStyle=solid}
> -(void)dealloc {
> [inputStream close];
> [outputStream close];
> [inputStream release];
> [outputStream release];
> [super dealloc];
> }
> {code}
> However I still don't know if that is the right way.
> Suggestions?
> Edit:
> The bug is still present in 0.9 I attached a TSocketClient.m that fixes this
> Problem, the TSocketClient also keeps track of the streams and upon
> deallocation it closes the stream, removes it from the runloop and releases
> it (if arc is not enabled). This also removes a bug in non-arc environment
> that where the streams have a retaincount of +1 after deallocation such that
> the bug described here won't occur and the streams leak memory
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
