Here they are against 0.9.1. What is also of interest to me are the autotools build system shortcomings, especially disabling openssl support. Regards, i
On 2 October 2013 23:01, Ben Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you willing to accept patches for these? What would you prefer them > > against? Is there a plan to move towards better support for c++11? > > Immanuel > Yes. http://thrift.apache.org/docs/HowToContribute/ > > In general, we want to aim for C++11 "clean" code, but we don't plan using > / targeting C++11. Stated in another way, we want our C++ libraries to be > buildable with both C++98 and C++11.+ > > I suspect that your changes have some overlap with an outstanding patch > that I have: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2029 >
