[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13813614#comment-13813614
 ] 

Roger Meier commented on THRIFT-1813:
-------------------------------------

do we really need the new function autogen_summary?
why is autogen_comment not sufficient?

rebased patches are welcome!

> Add @Generated annotation to generated classes
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-1813
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1813
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java - Compiler
>            Reporter: Arvind Jayaprakash
>         Attachments: thrift-1813-generated-annotation.patch
>
>
> Why?
> # A lot of static analysis tools understand the javax.annotation.Generated 
> annotation and treat those classes differently.
> # Setting the date field with the date & comments field with the version of 
> the thrift compiler might prove to be valuable for tracing the origins of the 
> generated file.
> The overheads should be minimal as the retention policy of the annotation is 
> purely at a source level



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to