[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14105823#comment-14105823
]
Randy Abernethy commented on THRIFT-2674:
-----------------------------------------
Hey Stig,
There's work going on to add TBinaryProtocol and TCompact protocol to the
browser side (they are already present in Node). Give the three possible
encodings and the presence of "application/thrift" in other languages what do
you think about this:
TJSONProtocol: application/thrift+json
TBinaryProtocol: application/thrift
TCompactProtocol: application/thrift.compact
or some such?
-Randy
> JavaScript: declare Accept: and Content-Type: in request
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-2674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2674
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JavaScript - Library
> Reporter: Stig Bakken
> Priority: Minor
>
> When a JS client communicates with a backend supporting several encodings,
> knowing which protocol to use is a bit kludgy. This patch tries to fix that
> by always setting the Accept: and Content-Type: request headers to
> "application/json".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
