+1 I really liked the flexibility and the degree of Windows support when dealing with both tools for patches. Only downside for me has been having two systems.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Ben Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > +0 > > I don't have strong opinions on autoconf vs. cmake. +1 for getting rid of > one of the build systems though. Many thanks for those that took the > effort to develop and try out the new build system. > > Jake Farrell <[email protected]> wrote on 05/12/2015 11:21:41 PM: > > > From: Jake Farrell <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > > Date: 05/12/2015 11:21 PM > > Subject: [VOTE] Switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake > > > > Based on a previous positive discussion regarding switching our build > > system over from autoconf to cmake [1] and the recent progress that has > > been made with cmake in trunk I would like to propose the following > > > > 1. we cut Apache Thrift 0.9.3 using the current layout with autoconf > > 2. remove autoconf completely from trunk and replace any missing library > > builds with cmake > > 3. cut Apache Thrift 1.0 with cmake > > > > I am concerned that not selecting one build system over the other and > > trying to maintain both will start to impact quality in the long run and > > want to make sure that we maintain the the best possible experience for > our > > community and developers. > > > > Since this is a major change in how the project is built I want to > > encourage all community members to cast a vote as this will impact how > > everyone uses Apache Thrift on a regular basis > > > > The vote will close on Sun May 17 00:00:00 EDT 2015 > > > > [ ] +1 Switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not switch Apache Thrift from autoconf to cmake because... > > > > I would like to get the voting started with my own +1 > > > > -Jake > > > > [1]: http://s.apache.org/1HC >
