[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yunchi Luo updated THRIFT-3547:
-------------------------------
Description:
NodeJS uses file paths rather than namespaces to manage modules. However, the
Thrift generated code ignores file paths.
I.e. if we have
foo.thrift:
include "../../shared.thrift";
It will turn into
foo_types.js:
var shared_types = require("./shared.thrift");
This forces us to put all generated node code in the same directory. It's
problematic since if we happen to have
a/foo.thrift
b/foo.thrift
One file will have to overwrite the other...
I'm happy to make a patch for this, but unclear to me how much of a breaking
change this would be for people, if it is at all.
was:
NodeJS uses file paths rather than namespaces to manage modules. However, the
Thrift compiler ignores file paths.
I.e. if we have
foo.thrift:
include "../../shared.thrift";
It will turn into
foo_types.js:
var shared_types = require("./shared.thrift");
This forces us to put all generated node code in the same directory. It's
problematic since if we happen to have
a/foo.thrift
b/foo.thrift
One file will have to overwrite the other...
I'm happy to make a patch for this, but unclear to me how much of a breaking
change this would be for people, if it is at all.
> NodeJS generated require() paths should mirror include paths
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-3547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3547
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Node.js - Compiler
> Affects Versions: 0.9.3
> Reporter: Yunchi Luo
>
> NodeJS uses file paths rather than namespaces to manage modules. However, the
> Thrift generated code ignores file paths.
> I.e. if we have
> foo.thrift:
> include "../../shared.thrift";
> It will turn into
> foo_types.js:
> var shared_types = require("./shared.thrift");
> This forces us to put all generated node code in the same directory. It's
> problematic since if we happen to have
> a/foo.thrift
> b/foo.thrift
> One file will have to overwrite the other...
> I'm happy to make a patch for this, but unclear to me how much of a breaking
> change this would be for people, if it is at all.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)