[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Buğra Gedik updated THRIFT-3932:
--------------------------------
Description:
{{ThreadManger::join}} calls {{stopImpl(true)}}, which in turn calls
{{removeWorker(workerCount_);}}. The latter waits until {{while (workerCount_
!= workerMaxCount_)}}. Within the {{run}} method of the workers, the last
thread that detects {{workerCount_ == workerMaxCount_}} notifies
{{removeWorker}}. The {{run}} method has the following additional code that is
executed at the very end:
{code}
{
Synchronized s(manager_->workerMonitor_);
manager_->deadWorkers_.insert(this->thread());
if (notifyManager) {
manager_->workerMonitor_.notify();
}
}
{code}
This is an independent synchronized block. Now assume 2 threads. One of them
has {{notifyManager=true}} as it detected the {{workerCount_ ==
workerMaxCount_}} condition earlier. It is possible that this thread gets to
execute the above code block first, {{ThreadManager}}'s {{removeWorker}}
method unblocks, and eventually {{ThreadManage}}r's {{join}} returns and the
object is destructed. When the other thread reaches the synchronized block
above, it will crash, as the manager is not around anymore.
Besides, {{ThreadManager}} never joins its threads.
Attached is a small fix that addresses these problems.
was:
{{ThreadManger::join}} calls {{stopImpl(true)}}, which in turn calls
{{removeWorker(workerCount_);}}. The latter waits until {{while (workerCount_
!= workerMaxCount_)}}. Within the {{run}} method of the workers, the last
thread that detects {{workerCount_ == workerMaxCount_}} notifies
{{removeWorker}}. The {{run}} method has the following additional code that is
executed at the very end:
{code}
{
Synchronized s(manager_->workerMonitor_);
manager_->deadWorkers_.insert(this->thread());
if (notifyManager) {
manager_->workerMonitor_.notify();
}
}
{code}
This is an independent synchronized block. Now assume 2 threads. One of them
has {{notifyManager=true}} as it detected the {{workerCount_ ==
workerMaxCount_}} condition earlier. It is possible that this thread gets to
execute the above code first, and the ThreadManager's {{removeWorker}} method
unblocks and eventually the ThreadManager's {{join}} returns and the object is
destructed. When the other thread reaches the synchronized block above, it will
crash, as the manager is not around anymore.
Besides, {{ThreadManager}} never joins its threads.
Attached is a small fix that addresses these problems.
> C++ ThreadManager has a rare termination race
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-3932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3932
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Buğra Gedik
> Attachments: thrift-patch
>
>
> {{ThreadManger::join}} calls {{stopImpl(true)}}, which in turn calls
> {{removeWorker(workerCount_);}}. The latter waits until {{while (workerCount_
> != workerMaxCount_)}}. Within the {{run}} method of the workers, the last
> thread that detects {{workerCount_ == workerMaxCount_}} notifies
> {{removeWorker}}. The {{run}} method has the following additional code that
> is executed at the very end:
> {code}
> {
> Synchronized s(manager_->workerMonitor_);
> manager_->deadWorkers_.insert(this->thread());
> if (notifyManager) {
> manager_->workerMonitor_.notify();
> }
> }
> {code}
> This is an independent synchronized block. Now assume 2 threads. One of them
> has {{notifyManager=true}} as it detected the {{workerCount_ ==
> workerMaxCount_}} condition earlier. It is possible that this thread gets to
> execute the above code block first, {{ThreadManager}}'s {{removeWorker}}
> method unblocks, and eventually {{ThreadManage}}r's {{join}} returns and the
> object is destructed. When the other thread reaches the synchronized block
> above, it will crash, as the manager is not around anymore.
> Besides, {{ThreadManager}} never joins its threads.
> Attached is a small fix that addresses these problems.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
