Github user jeking3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1353#discussion_r138711309
--- Diff: lib/cpp/test/concurrency/TimerManagerTests.h ---
@@ -192,6 +192,38 @@ class TimerManagerTests {
return true;
}
+ /**
+ * This test creates two tasks, removes the first one then waits for the
second one. It then
+ * verifies that the timer manager properly clean up itself and the
remaining orphaned timeout
+ * task when the manager goes out of scope and its destructor is called.
+ */
+ bool test03(int64_t timeout = 1000LL) {
+ TimerManager timerManager;
+ timerManager.threadFactory(shared_ptr<PlatformThreadFactory>(new
PlatformThreadFactory()));
+ timerManager.start();
+ assert(timerManager.state() == TimerManager::STARTED);
+
+ Synchronized s(_monitor);
+
+ // Setup the two tasks
+ shared_ptr<TimerManagerTests::Task> taskToRemove
+ = shared_ptr<TimerManagerTests::Task>(new
TimerManagerTests::Task(_monitor, timeout / 2));
+ TimerManager::Timer timer = timerManager.add(taskToRemove,
taskToRemove->_timeout);
+
+ shared_ptr<TimerManagerTests::Task> task
+ = shared_ptr<TimerManagerTests::Task>(new
TimerManagerTests::Task(_monitor, timeout));
+ timerManager.add(task, task->_timeout);
+
+ // Remove one task and wait until the other has completed
+ timerManager.remove(timer);
--- End diff --
recommend calling remove a second time and validating expected behavior
---