[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16212477#comment-16212477
 ] 

Christian Ciach edited comment on THRIFT-4362 at 10/20/17 10:38 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you think I can submit this patch as-is or do you have any suggestions for 
improvement?

Edit: As mentioned, with my patch the size may be checked multiple times. So I 
think it's a good idea to remove the other calls to the size-check method.


was (Author: christianciach):
Do you think I can submit this patch as-is or do you have any suggestions for 
improvement?

> Missing size-check can lead to huge memory allocation
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4362
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4362
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java - Library
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.3, 0.10.0
>            Reporter: Christian Ciach
>            Assignee: James E. King, III
>         Attachments: check-size.patch
>
>
> In some cases the method 
> {{org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readStringBody(int size)}} gets 
> called with a "size" parameter that has not been validated by the existing 
> method {{checkStringReadLength(int size)}}.
> This is true if the method is called by {{readMessageBegin()}} of the same 
> class. The method {{readString()}} checks the size correctly before calling 
> {{readStringBody(int size)}}.
> Since the methods {{readStringBody(int size)}} and {{readMessageBegin()}} are 
> public, there may be other callers who don't check the size correctly.
> We encountered this issue in production several times. Because of this we are 
> currently using our own patched version of libthrift-0.9.3. The patch is 
> attached, but it is surely not the best solution, because with this patch the 
> size may be checked twice, depending on the caller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to