Github user zhiyu-he commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1440
@jeking3
but the difference between buffer-transport and frame_transportï¼ is only
the data-length.
i think thrift transport only use for raw-socket read&write.
within golang, it's inefficient and cost more cpu time.
in binary_protocol, e.g for int64,
int64->temp-buf(binary_protol)->buf(transport-buf)->socket
this is not go enough for efficiency
so i want optimize this partã---
