[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John Boiles updated THRIFT-4868:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Go bug for optional sets with a default value  (was: Go bug for 
sets with a default value)

> Go bug for optional sets with a default value
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-4868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-4868
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Go - Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 0.12.0
>            Reporter: John Boiles
>            Priority: Major
>
> There's a bug in the Thrift Go generator that happens when set types are used 
> with a default field. For example, a simple struct like this:
> {code:java}
> struct SetPointerTest {
>   1: optional set<string> with_default = [ "test" ]
> }
> {code}
> Generates a struct like this
> {code}
> type SetPointerTest struct {
>   WithDefault *[]string `thrift:"with_default,1" db:"with_default" 
> json:"with_default"`
> }
> {code}
> And associated Go code with a line like this:
> {code:go}
> if reflect.DeepEqual(*p.WithDefault[i],*p.WithDefault[j]) {
> {code}
> Which fails with an error
> {code}
> gen-go/setpointertest/SetPointerTest.go:125:44: invalid operation: 
> p.WithDefault[i] (type *[]string does not support indexing)
> {code}
> Thrift sets only get translated to Go pointer values (causing this error) 
> when a default value is set. This is because the 
> {{t_go_generator::is_pointer_field}} method has [some 
> logic|https://github.com/apache/thrift/blob/master/compiler/cpp/src/thrift/generate/t_go_generator.cc#L410-L411]
>  that returns {{true}} if the set has a default value. I'm unsure why this is 
> the case; it seems simpler to not change the type when there's a default 
> value. A Golang slice is a pointer value by default, so {{nil}} can still be 
> used for {{optional}} fields. I'd be super interested to understand why the 
> code was written this way.
> However, since changing the pointer behavior would be a version-incompatible 
> change, I propose we do the simple thing for now to fix Go compilation. I'll 
> submit a patch with a test shortly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to