CC'ing James King who did our Travis setup IIRC.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, at 10:42, Mario Emmenlauer wrote: > > In the past weeks I've had a significant number of failing Travis CI > builds, the majority of which was failing in something that looked like > a docker build. > > Is it correct and intended that Travis builds, or at least updates, a > docker image for every test? Maybe this step could be split out of the > standard tests and moved to a dedicated task? This may have the down- > side that tests would use whatever status the latest official docker > image has, which may or may not be up-to-date with upstream ressoures. > But it brings a significant speedup, much better error resilience and > last, not least, a more reproducible test experience. > > Can anyone comment about the current design? > > All the best, > > Mario > >
