+1 to Nick's suggestion. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Nick Burch <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Ken Krugler wrote: > >> I'm wondering how best to handle this type of configuration, in a way >> that's relatively resilient to Tika configuration changes and my target set >> of formats. >> > > Would it not make more sense to use the xml based TikaConfig constructor > (file, inputstream etc), rather than the default one? You should be able to > list just the parsers you want > > Nick >
