LOL nice Ken! Way to be the guy to bring it up! ;) I think the intention is *to not do* any logging as you mentioned. If you need code that does logging, I'd write a facade/wrapper around the Tika core module that you need logging in. And then cross your fingers, spin around, click your heels together and pick...
^_^ Cheers, Chris On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Ken Krugler wrote: > I shudder to bring this up, but if there's some code that's being > integrated into Tika, and it wants to do logging, then what logging > framework should it use? > > Currently it doesn't look like anybody does any logging inside of > Tika, which avoids the issue (good) but means there's no precedent. > > Has this come up before? I haven't seen any slf4j vs. commons-logging > vs. insert-your-favorite-logging-facade-here debates on the list, and > I'm not sad :) > > Thanks, > > -- Ken > > -------------------------- > Ken Krugler > +1 530-210-6378 > http://bixolabs.com > e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
