[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13210240#comment-13210240
]
Jukka Zitting commented on TIKA-864:
------------------------------------
Like in TIKA-865, is this a real measurable performance bottleneck? If not, I
suggest we keep the code as is.
> Metadata.formatDate should use ThreadLocal
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-864
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-864
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: metadata
> Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
>
> Currently this is a synchronized method that uses a single instance of
> DateFormat. Instead it could use a pool of ThreadLocal DateFormat instances
> and avoid the sync blocking.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
