[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573670#comment-13573670
 ] 

Ken Krugler commented on TIKA-369:
----------------------------------

I've been using language-detection in another project for six months. In 
general it works better than what's in Tika, but has a number of design/coding 
issues (gnarly singleton DetectorFactory, assumption that profiles are loaded 
from external files, problems with setting a priori language probabilities). 
I've got a fork of it with some fixes, but it's not ready for prime time.

So net-net is a mild +1 from me, but I think there may be some post-integration 
challenges.
                
> Improve accuracy of language detection
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-369
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: languageidentifier
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Ken Krugler
>            Assignee: Ken Krugler
>         Attachments: lingdet-mccs.pdf, Surprise and Coincidence.pdf, 
> textcat.pdf
>
>
> Currently the LanguageProfile code uses 3-grams to find the best language 
> profile using Pearson's chi-square test. This has three issues:
> 1. The results aren't very good for short runs of text. Ted Dunning's paper 
> (attached) indicates that a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) test works much 
> better, which would then make language detection faster due to less text 
> needing to be processed.
> 2. The current LanguageIdentifier.isReasonablyCertain() method uses an exact 
> value as a threshold for certainty. This is very sensitive to the amount of 
> text being processed, and thus gives false negative results for short runs of 
> text.
> 3. Certainty should also be based on how much better the result is for 
> language X, compared to the next best language. If two languages both had 
> identical sum-of-squares values, and this value was below the threshold, then 
> the result is still not very certain.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to