I actually understand a more open fork is available; it seems to be more active than fest: assertj https://github.com/joel-costigliola/assertj-core
HTH Ste Ste On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Hong-Thai Nguyen < hong-thai.ngu...@polyspot.com> wrote: > Just syntax is much more fluent, nothing change with your IDE. > More about Fest vs Junit: > http://maciejwalkowiak.pl/blog/2012/03/23/better-unit-tests-with-fest-assert/ > > > Hong-Thai > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Konstantin Gribov [mailto:gros...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : samedi 18 janvier 2014 09:01 > À : dev@tika.apache.org > Objet : Re: Passing to FEST for JUnit tests ? > > Does it give something more than just fluent interface? Does it integrate > to IDEs as good as JUnit? > > -- > Best regards, > Konstantin Gribov. > > > 2014/1/17 Hong-Thai Nguyen <hong-thai.ngu...@polyspot.com> > > > Dear all, > > > > Fest (https://code.google.com/p/fest/ ) syntax is much intuitive than > > JUnit : > > assertEquals("result", gettingResult()); > > by > > assertThat(gettingResult(), is("result")); > > > > We may replace progressively in our tests. > > > > Hong-Thai > > > > >
