Thanks Kai, I’ll make a note to update the download page to clearly specify that the links are to mirrors.
Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: <Linden>, Kai Yves <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 at 9:21 AM To: Chris Mattmann <[email protected]>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: AW: Tika: Invalid check sums / signatures >Hi Chris, > >in the meantime I just realized that it was a bad idea to right-click the >hyper-linked file names on the download page >(<http://tika.apache.org/download.html>, which is actually a landing page >for the Tika downloads). I might not be the only one to whom the file >names (with extensions) suggested to do that. Instead of the actual file >I only got the HTML page with the mirror list which has the same name. >The suffixes of the mirror list pages (*.zip and *.jar respectively >instead of *.html) are misleading. Because of that I discovered my >mistake only when wondering about the rather small file length of the >downloaded items. > >The check sums were verified perfectly for the actual files which I >downloaded from the mirror list pages. > >Something like "mirror list" in parentheses behind the file names on the >download page (<http://tika.apache.org/download.html>) could be helpful. > >Sorry for the confusion, >Kai Yves > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:[email protected]] >Date: Wednesday, 2014-11-26 17:10 >To: Linden, Kai Yves; [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Tika: Invalid check sums / signatures > >Hi Kai, > >We had someone recently ask about this - some of the devs checked and >could verify. Could you show us the exact command you are using? >Also can you confirm the contents of your ASC files and your SHA1? > >Cheers, >Chris > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >Chief Architect >Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet >Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >Email: [email protected] >WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of >Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: <Linden>, Kai Yves <[email protected]> >Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 at 4:30 AM >To: Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> >Subject: Tika: Invalid check sums / signatures > >>Hello Chris Mattmann, >> >>please excuse me reporting this by e-mail. >> >>I wasn’t able to verify neither SHA1, MD5 check sums, nor asc >>signatures for the files which I downloaded from the links given on the >>download page of Tika: >>http://tika.apache.org/download.html >> >>neither for the source zip >>http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tika/tika-1.6-src.zip, nor for the >>application jar >>http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tika/tika-app-1.6.jar. >> >>Maybe distribution files and check sums are no longer congruent after a >>recent update? >> >>Kind regards >> >>Kai Yves Linden >>Technischer Koordinator >> >>BiPRO e.V. >> >>Münsterstr. 304 | 40470 Düsseldorf >>E-Mail: [email protected] >>http://www.bipro.net <http://www.bipro.net/> >>_______________________________________________________________________ >>___ >>_________ >>Der BiPRO e.V. gestaltet, fördert und optimiert als neutrale >>Organisation mit Hilfe von fachlichen und technischen Normen >>unternehmensübergreifende Geschäftsprozesse in der Assekuranz. >>BiPRO ist ein eingetragener Verein, registriert am Amtsgericht >>Düsseldorf, Registernummer: VR 9713, Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer >>DE282068978, Finanzamt >> Düsseldorf Nord >> >>Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte >>Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese >>E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den >>Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie >>die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist nicht gestattet. >>This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If >>you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in >> error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. >>Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in >>this e-mail is strictly forbidden. >> >> >
