[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14230589#comment-14230589
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on TIKA-1442:
---------------------------------------
Weird thing in the 1.8.6 vs 1.8.8 test: according to the excel file, 301125.pdf
worked in 1.8.6 but not in 1.8.8 (empty top n words). There are no exceptions
in the exceptions column. When I test it, it fails with both with an exception.
> Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.8
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Assignee: Tim Allison
> Fix For: 1.8
>
> Attachments: PDFBox_1_8_6DVPDFBox_1_8_8-TRAD-b156.xlsx,
> PDFBox_1_8_6VPDFBox_1_8_8-b145.xlsx, PDFBox_1_8_6VPDFBox_1_8_8-b145.zip,
> PDFBox_1_8_8-ClassicVPDFBox_1_8_8-NonSeq.xlsx,
> PDFBox_1_8_8-ClassicVPDFBox_1_8_8-NonSeq.xlsx,
> PDFBox_1_8_8-TRADVPDFBox_1_8_8-NONSEQ-b156.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOT.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTb.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.zip
>
>
> Given the regressions we identified in PDFBox 1.8.7, we should upgrade to
> 1.8.8 as soon as it is ready. I'm tempted to call this a blocker on Tika
> 1.7. Let's use this issue to carry on the discussion of regression testing
> (if any further discussion is necessary) or any other prep that needs to
> happen before 1.8.8's release.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
