Thanks Lewis - I think the Jenkins builds are most used, so I would be +1 to kill Buildbot. Happy to hear what others think.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Kill Buildbot Builds >Hi Folks, >Wanted to poll the dev@ list and see if the Buildbot builds at >ci.apache.org >are required? >We have nightly and also hourly polling builds for Tika trunk against JDK >1.6 and 1.7. Failures and unable builds are shadowed to dev@, so AFAIAC we >are *covered* for CI builds including SNAPSHOT deployments and Javadoc >updates. >Any comments before I disable the buildbot builds and save Infra some >resources. >Ta >Lewis > >-- >*Lewis*
