Once we fix TIKA-1584, I don't have a preference. I defer to Chris's experience (so I guess, +1 for 1.8) given the amount of work required.
It'd be great if we could make sure we aren't bundling any pdfs in our tika-app jar, too. Many apologies if that's been fixed! ________________________________________ From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 11:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated with releasing (updating the website; sending emails; waiting periods, etc.) let’s ship all the updates we have too along with the jhighlight fix. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 >Hi Folks, > >Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to >release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager >again. > >Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1? > >Does anyone have any last minute issues they'd like to finish and see in >Tika 1.X? I'd like to get the example working with CORS (TIKA-1585 and >TIKA-1586). Any others? > >Have a good weekend, >Tyler
