Also I can run the RC on a subset of ImageCat [1] to test the new RC too when it’s ready.
Cheers, Chris [1] https://github.com/chrismattmann/imagecat/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 3:22 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 >I just remembered TIKA-1509 and TIKA-1558 -- testing now for blacklist >functionality through TIKA-1509. If that works, I'll back out TIKA-1558. > >Tim, I think you should run govdocs from the RC, in case something changes >between your run and the cut. > >Tyler > >On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> All, >> >> I've made the changes that I had hoped to. Grib pdf exclusion remains >>for >> any takers. >> >> Let me know when I should initiate the run against govdocs1 to see if >> there are any surprises on that corpus with Tika 1.8. >> >> Best, >> >> Tim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:03 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 >> >> Unless there are objections, I'd like these to be resolved before 1.8: >> >> TIKA-1584 -- I'll fix >> TIKA-1575 -- Resolved by Konstantin Gribov (thank you!) >> TIKA-1512 -- I'll put in a temporary fix so that we don't get IOOBEs, >>but >> I'll leave this open and do some more digging to see if we need to open >>a >> ticket at the POI level >> TIKA-1511 -- I'll remove "provided" for xerial >> >> TIKA-1549 -- We should thank Toke Eskildsen in CHANGES.txt, no? >> >> I'll have these fixes completed by noon EDT. Should I run against >> govdocs1 before or after the RC? >> >> My last build of Tika app (a few days ago) ballooned to ~43MB, and >>that's >> before I add ~3MB for xerial. Tika server is now ~48MB. As of my last >> build, we are still including ~4MB of pdfs (README.NLDAS1.pdf and >> README.NLDAS2.pdf) from the GRIB(?) parser in the tika-app and >>tika-server >> jars. >> >> Best, >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tyler Palsulich [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 9:13 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 >> >> Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless >> something else pops up). >> >> Thank you everyone. >> >> Tyler >> On Mar 29, 2015 4:43 AM, "Hong-Thai Nguyen" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> > +1 for 1.8 >> > >> > Hong-Thai >> > >> > > On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Folks, >> > > >> > > Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we >>need >> to >> > > release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release >>manager >> > > again. >> > > >> > > Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1? >> > > >> > > Does anyone have any last minute issues they'd like to finish and >>see >> in >> > > Tika 1.X? I'd like to get the example working with CORS (TIKA-1585 >>and >> > > TIKA-1586). Any others? >> > > >> > > Have a good weekend, >> > > Tyler >> > >>
