+1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:08 AM To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org> Subject: RE: release Tika 1.10? >Just finished the run against ~2.8 million docs (4.8 million including >attachments) from a combination of govdocs1 and Common Crawl. I compared >1.9 with trunk. > >Most looks good. > >Some highlights: >* Thanks to Andrew Jackson and TIKA-1678, we're now getting better >metadata out of ~1300 from 550k PDFs. This appears to be far more common >in Common Crawl PDFs than in govdocs1 PDFs. >* No significant changes found in the handful of msg files...I wanted to >check after the work on TIKA-1238. >* Thanks to Andreas Beeker and TIKA-1046/POI 54332, there are far fewer >PPT exceptions >* There are a very few more files in CommonCrawl that are now incorrectly >identified as RFC vs text (TIKA-1602), but this is a tiny handful (total >of 4 documents in both CC and govdocs1) > >A regret: >This run used the digesting parser for both container and embedded files. > This causes some truncated (=corrupt) package files to throw an >exception before they otherwise would. The opposite happens, too (more >embedded files when using the digester), but this is extremely rare. This >means that for truncated gz, x-xz and x-archive files there are many more >with fewer attachments in Tika 1.10-SNAPSHOT than in Tika 1.9. > >With Konstantin's and Bob's fix of TIKA-1524, I think we're in good shape >for 1.10...from my perspective. > > Best, > > Tim >-----Original Message----- >From: David Meikle [mailto:loo...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:50 AM >To: dev@tika.apache.org >Subject: Re: release Tika 1.10? > > >> On 23 Jul 2015, at 14:07, Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org> >>wrote: >> >> With the fix of TIKA-1690, I think it makes sense to roll a new >>release (1.10) in the next week or so. I'd like to get TIKA-1667 >>(upgrade poi) in before the release. Are there any other blockers on >>1.10? > >+1 from me too. As discussed on private, I will roll the release on >Tuesday night (UK Time) to give people time to shout for other candidates. > >Cheers, >Dave
