[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14697852#comment-14697852
]
Nick Burch commented on TIKA-1706:
----------------------------------
Since tika-parsers already depends on Commons IO, would you be able to split
your patch into two?
We can probably apply the tika-parsers changes / tidy-ups straight away, the
first few at least look perfectly sensible to me.
However, having the tika-core related changes independently will help with the
review there, as that's the one I think will likely need more oversight and
thinking. Especially from [~jukkaz], who made the original inlining changes,
and might be best placed to comment on the updated plan now we're a few years
later on
> Bring back commons-io to tika-core
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1706
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Yaniv Kunda
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.11
>
> Attachments: TIKA-1706.patch
>
>
> TIKA-249 inlined select commons-io classes in order to simplify the
> dependency tree and save some space.
> I believe these arguments are weaker nowadays due to the following concerns:
> - Most of the non-core modules already use commons-io, and since tika-core is
> usually not used by itself, commons-io is already included with it
> - Since some modules use both tika-core and commons-io, it's not clear which
> code should be used
> - Having the inlined classes causes more maintenance and/or technology debt
> (which in turn causes more maintenance)
> - Newer commons-io code utilizes newer platform code, e.g. using Charset
> objects instead of encoding names, being able to use StringBuilder instead of
> StringBuffer, and so on.
> I'll be happy to provide a patch to replace usages of the inlined classes
> with commons-io classes if this is accepted.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
