+1 - All projects build, test pass, OSGi bundle loads, checksums match.
- Bob
On 10/22/2015 8:49 PM, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
+1 from me -- builds, tests pass, sanity check files parse, and sums look
good. But, I get a warning that the signature is not certified with a
trusted signature.
Tyler
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:43 AM Allison, Timothy B. <[email protected]>
wrote:
+0 (some regressions in ppt content)
I just finished the batch comparison run on ~1.8 million files in our
govdocs1 and commoncrawl corpora comparing Tika 1.10 to 1.11-rc1. As a
caveat, the eval code is still in development and there may be bugs in the
reports.
Results are here:
https://github.com/tballison/share/blob/master/tika_comparisons/tika_1_10_vs_1_11-rc1.zip
Key reports:
contents/content_diffs.csv (file had one corrupt row when viewing in
Excel...manually deleted offending content)
exceptions/newExceptionsInBByMimeTypeByStackTrace.csv (small handful)
exceptions/fixedExceptionsInBByMimeType.csv (none!)
mimes/mime_diffs_A_to_B.csv
On the positive side:
From "mime_diffs_A_to_B.csv", it looks like we are catching more pdfs as
pdfs (that text/xhtml) than we were...great! We're identifying more files
as images (jpeg, pict) than as xhtml, and, from a quick look, this appears
to be an improvement. We have at least 9 new x-hwp-v5 (great!).
On the negative side:
1) We have a few regressions in ppt exceptions (six of the same aioobe).
2) We have regressions in ppt content (it looks like we're not adding a
new line/word break where we need to). The regressions are small per file,
but they affect ~220 ppts out of ~1500 (~15%).
Other than the regressions in ppt content, I'd be +1, but I don't think
this is severe enough to warrant a re-spin. Happy to look into a fix,
though, if we want a re-spin...and even if we don't, I'll start looking
into this asap.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.11 Release Candidate #1
Hi Folks,
A first candidate for the Tika 1.11 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.11-rc1/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
d0dde7b3a4f1a2fb6ccd741552ea180dddab630a
In addition, a staged maven repository is available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1014/
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.11.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.11 [ ] -1 Do not release this
package because…
Cheers,
Chris
P.S. Of course here is my +1.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
