[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15131749#comment-15131749
]
Ken Krugler commented on TIKA-1824:
-----------------------------------
As someone who regularly deals with 100s of jars in the dependency tree, I'm a
big +1 for having "tika-" as a prefix for every jar.
I'm less concerned about tika-cad-parsers vs. tika-parsers-cad (as an example),
with a mild preference for the former.
I'd rather not have the module suffix, mostly because I haven't been paying any
attention to the OSGi issues, nor do I have a use case for that yet, and thus
it doesn't add value for me personally. But that's a very weak -1, given my
lack of background in this space.
> Tika 2.0 - Create Initial Parser Modules
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Bob Paulin
> Assignee: Bob Paulin
>
> Create initial break down of parser modules.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
