All,
Do I understand correctly that we should be committing most changes to both
trunk and 2.x? Obviously, the 2.x commits are for 2.x. :)
Or will merge really, actually, truly work at some point in the future to
merge changes in trunk to 2.x?
Best,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Hudson (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (TIKA-1874) Fix rare npe in XWPFListManager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15167620#comment-15167620
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-1874:
------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in tika-2.x #31 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/tika-2.x/31/])
TIKA-1874 fix small npe (tallison: rev 5083cc11c6230218ecef7d0161fa92bbf8d317e6)
*
tika-parser-modules/tika-parser-office-module/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/microsoft/ooxml/XWPFListManager.java
> Fix rare npe in XWPFListManager
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1874
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1874
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Many thanks to [~centic]'s
> [CommonCrawlDocumentDownload|https://github.com/centic9/CommonCrawlDocumentDownload],
> I recently grabbed .docx files from the initial index that comes with that
> code. I'll be adding these docs to our regular regression testing for
> TIKA-1302.
> While running Tika on these ~166k docs, ~30 of those files had an NPE in
> XWPFListManager. We need to add a null check.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
