[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15484262#comment-15484262
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2058:
-----------------------------------

bq. Could these be related however - could there be other changes that have 
been made in the poi libraries that are related to the OOM problem?

Could be. POI is under constant development.  

bq. no it’s lower level than that - whether primary or embedded they all end up 
in the same place, this is where I commented it out.

Ah, ok.  Got it.  You can also turn off parsers in the service loading file: 
META-INF/services/org.apache.tika.parser.Parser

We've also recently introduced a way to turn off parsers via Tika config.



> Memory Leak in Tika version 1.13 when parsing millions of files
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-2058
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2058
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.13
>            Reporter: Tim Barrett
>
> We have an application using Tika which parses roughly 7,000,000 files of 
> different types, many of the files are MSG files with attachments. This works 
> correctly with Tika 1.9, and has been in production for over a year,  with 
> parsing runs taking place every few weeks. The same application runs into 
> insufficient memory problems (java heap) when using Tika 1.13.
> I have used lsof and file leak detector to track down open files, however 
> neither shows any open files when the application is running. I did find an 
> issue with open files https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2015, 
> however there was a workaround for this and this is not the issue.
> I am sorry to have to report this with a level of vagueness, but with lsof 
> turning nothing up I am a bit stuck as to how to investigate further. We are 
> more than willing to help by testing on the basis of any ideas provided.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to