I’m happy to roll with this RC – it definitely has to do with something that exiftool installs or with exiftool itself. Recommend checking out the issue that we filed that Tim linked earlier.
Konstantin, Tim, I will finish off the release this week if there are no further objections. I think we have enough +1s to move forward. I’ll finish the RC on Friday if there are no further comments. Thanks, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-502 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 10/31/16, 9:02 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote: Aside from the PGP key issues, do we need more time to understand the serializable issues with AutoDetectParser? Or, are we good to go? -----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Gribov [mailto:gros...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:42 PM To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.14 Release Candidate #1 Chris, you have new PGP key which is not present your account in [1]. Could you please update it there? Also, `KEYS` file in `tika-1.14-src.zip` contains only your old PGP key. SHA-1 and MD5 digests are fine, `tika-server` and `tika-app` work fine on Arch Linux, OpenJDK 8u112 with and without Tesseract. Build (`mvn clean package verify`) fails same way as Julien Nioche and Dave mentioned on Arch Linux with or without tesseract. I have no exiftool, so I'll try to investigate what else make `AutoDetectParser` non-serializable. I hope, I'll have a bit time this evening for this. Also, one test fails `testParserHandlingOfNonSerializable` because exception message was `Unable to serialize [AutoDetectParser] to pass to the Fork...` instead of `Unable to serialize [ParseContext] to pass to the Fork...`. But it seems the same issue as above. Both issues aren't strict blockers to me but I'd ask you to increase voting time to dig into issue with non-serializable `AutoDetectParser` if you don't mind. [1]: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mattmann.asc пн, 24 окт. 2016 г. в 16:15, David Meikle <loo...@gmail.com>: Hello, I am getting the same as Julien without exiftool installed on my Mac. Everything passes on Windows 10 and Ubuntu. Will have a dig and see what I find. Cheers, Dave > On 20 Oct 2016, at 13:34, Julien Nioche > <lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > Am getting the following when running 'mvn clean package', have I forgotten > something obvious? > > Julien > > *Failed tests: * > * ForkParserIntegrationTest.testParserHandlingOfNonSerializable:210 > expected:<Unable to serialize [ParseContext] to pass to the Fork...> > but was:<Unable to serialize [AutoDetectParser] to pass to the > Fork...>* *Tests in error: * > * > ForkParserIntegrationTest.testAttachingADebuggerOnTheForkedParserShouldWork:234 > » Tika* > * ForkParserIntegrationTest.testForkedPDFParsing:257 » Tika Unable to > serialize ...* > * ForkParserIntegrationTest.testForkedTextParsing:66 » Tika Unable to > serialize ...* > > *Tests run: 755, Failures: 1, Errors: 3, Skipped: 17* > > *[INFO] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --* > *[INFO] Reactor Summary:* > *[INFO] * > *[INFO] Apache Tika parent ................................ SUCCESS > [4.368s]* > *[INFO] Apache Tika core .................................. SUCCESS > [16.487s]* > *[INFO] Apache Tika parsers ............................... FAILURE > [4:54.631s]* > > > > On 19 October 2016 at 19:48, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> A first candidate for the Tika 1.14 release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/ >> >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tika.git;a=tree;hb= >> 687d7706c9778e4f49f2834a07e5a9d99b23042b >> >> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is: >> ad9152392ffe6b620c8102ab538df0579b36c520 >> >> In addition, a staged maven repository is available here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1020 >> / >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.14. >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.14 [ ] -1 Do not release >> this package because.. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> P.S. Of course here is my +1. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* > > http://www.digitalpebble.com > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> -- Best regards, Konstantin Gribov
