[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830464#comment-15830464
]
Bob Paulin edited comment on TIKA-2245 at 1/19/17 7:30 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
[~grossws] In my experience OSGi is pretty unopinionated on logging. For
exmaple Pax-logging is what I often use
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/ops4j/Using+pax+logging . SLF4J is
supported
was (Author: bobpaulin):
[~grossws] In my experience OSGi is pretty unopinionated on logging. For
exmaple Pax-logging is what I often use
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/ops4j/Using+pax+logging
> Standardise logging
> -------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-2245
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15
> Reporter: Matthew Caruana Galizia
> Assignee: Konstantin Gribov
> Labels: logging
>
> Tika parsers sometimes use Log4j's Logger, sometimes the JUL
> (java.util.logging) Logger and sometimes SLF4j.
> It would be better to standardise on a single facade, for the sake of not
> having to configure multiple loggers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
