Sounds good.  W00t!

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 4:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15

Thanks Tim. I am going to try and get tika-dl added (if possible), and also try 
the Sentiment Parser next. If I can get one or both of those (in the next day 
or so), then I will give you the heads up to begin testing. Video recognition 
is in!





On 5/1/17, 12:42 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote:

    I finally had a chance to look through the results of the first regression 
run.
    
    I made a few trivial changes to our parsers and to tika-eval.
    
    We appear to have many more exceptions in files parsed by our 
CompressorParser, but this is because of reporting...not because of reality -- 
the exception is now coming in the container file, not an attachment...and 
tika-eval wasn't matching A and B correctly.
    
    There is a regression that's been fixed in PDFBox trunk (PDFBOX-3717), but 
I don't see that as a blocker.
    
    We have new exceptions in the new parsers, EMF, WMF, .xlsb, wordperfect, 
but that's because we're actually parsing those now. :)
    
    All else looks to be in decent shape.
    
    Chris and Team and All,
      Let me know when you're ready for me to kick off the next regression run.
    
              Cheers,
    
                      Tim
    
    
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:[email protected]] 
    Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:48 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
    
    Thank you!
    
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
    Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, 
NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) NASA Jet 
Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
    Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
    Email: [email protected]
    WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct 
Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern 
California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
    WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
     
    
    On 4/26/17, 9:35 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote:
    
        Oh.  Ok.  Will wait, then?
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:38 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
        
        I want to see if I can get in the VideoRecognition parser, and also the 
Sentiment one.
        
        I hope to get it done in the next day or so. Thanks.
        
        
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
        Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
        Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) 
Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) 
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
        Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
        Email: [email protected]
        WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
        
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
        Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct 
Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern 
California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
        WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
        
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
         
        
        On 4/26/17, 7:54 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote:
        
            With the added TSD parser, I think I should rerun the regression 
testing.  Given that, I also fixed 2099, and we'll benefit from a rerun.
            
            Anything else before I rerun the regression testing?
            
            Any problems observed in first run?
            
            
        
        
    
    


Reply via email to