FWIW, I believe there is some history on this but can’t find it right now.
I thought we discussed X.Y.Z versionining at one point and decided against it.
I have no objections to it however.
Aloha,
Chris
On 6/2/17, 2:39 PM, "Tyler Bui-Palsulich" <tbpalsul...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to 1.15.1.
It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security releases as they
come up.
Tyler
On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com> wrote:
> Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but I'd fully
> support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a 1.15.1
>
> - Bob
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
> > Maybe 1.15.1?
> >
> > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com>
escreveu:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it make
> >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks?
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
